In the article, the writer explores the notion of revenge and the often exaggerated fantasies associated with it. They describe how, while it is easy to imagine intricate plans for revenge and feel a sense of satisfaction from these thoughts, the reality of executing such plans is fraught with challenges. The author emphasizes that true revenge requires immense dedication and energy, which can often be seen as a waste when directed towards one’s enemies. They draw a parallel to the film ‘Oldboy,’ illustrating how the costly and labor-intensive nature of carrying out revenge makes it an impractical pursuit, especially compared to investments one could make towards personal betterment instead.

The article also discusses the philosophical and historical context of revenge by referencing the principles of retribution found in the ancient law code of Hammurabi, which embraced the idea of exacting punishment equivalent to the offense. However, the author critiques this approach, arguing that simply mirroring the offense—such as breaking one limb in retaliation for another—does not satisfy the desire for revenge adequately. This leads to a contemplation of the merits of outsourcing revenge to a higher authority, be it divine or legal, diminishing personal risk and effort, and allowing individuals to redirect their energy towards more productive endeavors.

Concluding the piece, the author refers to a current event—the sentencing of a political figure, indicating a shift in the traditional sense of justice and revenge in society. They highlight the recent life sentence handed down to a leader involved in civil unrest as a necessary legal action that fulfills the societal need for accountability, suggesting that sometimes it is better for justice to be enacted through established channels rather than taking matters into one’s own hands. This reflects a broader societal commentary on the balance between personal vendetta and legal punishment, questioning the efficacy and morality of each route.