As a legendary figure in the golfing world, Tiger Woods has dominated not only in terms of accolades but also in financial success, amassing a net worth nearing £1 billion. Approximately 10% of Woods' wealth comes from his winnings on the PGA Tour, while the lion's share is attributed to lucrative endorsements, particularly with Nike, as well as smart investments that have significantly increased his financial portfolio over time.

In contrast, Maverick McNealy, a rising star on the PGA Tour, finds himself among the wealthiest golfers primarily due to the substantial inheritance he is expected to receive from his father’s tech empire, which is estimated at £750 million. Though McNealy's financial standing allows him to be compared to Woods in some respects, his path to wealth is considerably different, relying heavily on familial financial support rather than individual achievements on the golf course.

The dynamics of wealth in golf prompt discussions on meritocracy versus inherited fortune, as seen in the contrasting backgrounds of Woods and McNealy. While Woods represents the pinnacle of success achieved through personal determination and branding, McNealy's future financial freedom raises questions about the role of family wealth in sports and the impact it may have on competition for both players and fans.