The article discusses a new initiative where 30% of Brazilian capitals are adopting involuntary hospitalization for homeless individuals with drug dependencies. This decision is rooted in the belief that such individuals pose a risk to themselves and others, and it is executed under the guidelines provided by the Federal Council of Medicine. According to these guidelines, relatives, responsible parties, or health officials can request hospitalization, which is supposed to be for the shortest duration necessary.

However, the effectiveness of this approach is a point of contention. The author notes skepticism among medical professionals experienced in treating addiction, who argue that involuntary hospitalization is not a long-term solution. They emphasize that legitimate treatment should involve the individual's willingness to engage in recovery processes, rather than coercion. The physiological challenges of withdrawal syndrome are also highlighted as an inherent part of the treatment, suggesting that forcing someone into treatment might lead to resistance rather than recovery.

The overall implication of this measure raises questions about the balance between public safety and personal rights, considering that individuals subjected to forced treatment may not have the motivation to continue recovery once released. The article calls for a reevaluation of how society approaches drug addiction, emphasizing the importance of voluntary participation in effective treatment strategies instead of relying on involuntary measures, which may not yield the desired outcomes.