In the aftermath of the murder of Quentin Deranque, socialist politician Jérôme Guedj publicly condemned La France Insoumise (LFI) for what he termed their 'moral responsibility' in connection with violence associated with the political party. Guedj, who is also a candidate for the 2027 presidential election, has taken a firm stance against Jean-Luc Mélenchon and expressed his dissatisfaction with his own party's lack of clarity on alliances with LFI.

Guédj's comments highlight a growing rift within the socialist party regarding their association with LFI, which he accuses of having links to violent movements. He argued that aligning with a party that shows tolerant behavior towards violence compromises the integrity of political engagement and betrays the principles of democratic dialogue. His call for an end to any form of partnership with LFI, including local elections, indicates a significant political strategy shift.

This conflict in French politics underscores the complexities of alliance-building in a rapidly changing political landscape, especially as the next presidential election approaches. Guedj's criticisms could resonate with constituents seeking strong leadership amid fears of political violence, potentially shifting voter sentiment away from parties perceived to harbor violent associations. This discourse may influence the future direction of socialist policies and their electoral strategy against competing factions in French politics.