The article explores the concept of the 'splinternet' in the context of Iran, particularly during the notable January blackout where citizens attempted to communicate and access information amid governmental censorship. While they could use a state-monitored messaging app and a local video sharing service to follow sports and read state news, critical information regarding human rights abuses and civilian casualties during protests was largely inaccessible to them. This limited flow of information represents a concerning trend in which state-controlled platforms give a false sense of connectivity while restricting genuine communication.

Moreover, the piece highlights how citizens' ability to share evidence of state violence and protests has been severely diminished. The article suggests that, in a society heavily filtered by government narratives, the information that does circulate tends to reinforce state power rather than promote transparency and accountability. The splinternet creates an environment where the state controls the narrative, thereby undermining the fundamental tenets of democracy by restricting free flow of information.

This troubling situation in Iran serves as a broader cautionary tale about the implications of the splinternet in authoritarian regimes worldwide. As states enhance their control over internet access and information dissemination, the potential risks for citizens, including more significant human rights violations and curtailment of civil liberties, grow exponentially. The article prompts critical reflection on how technology can be both a tool for connection and manipulation, particularly in the hands of repressive governments.