Following a setback from the United States Supreme Court, which deemed reciprocal tariffs illegal, former President Donald Trump has announced a new 15% global tariff. This decision has been met with scrutiny, particularly from legal experts such as Neal Katyal, who question the implications of increasing tariffs in response to judicial rulings against his policies. Katyal's comments reflect concerns about the legal validity and economic impact of Trump's tariff strategy.

The announcement comes as Trump looks to bolster support amid ongoing legal challenges and criticism over his previous tariff policies. By implementing a blanket global tariff, Trump aims to exert pressure on various countries to align with his economic stance, but such measures could lead to retaliation and increased trade tensions. This has raised concerns among economists and political analysts who fear that further escalation of tariffs could hurt the U.S. economy and create uncertainty in international markets.

Katyal's critique emphasizes the need for careful consideration of the legal and economic ramifications of tariff policies, especially as they can affect the livelihoods of many American businesses and consumers. The situation underscores a growing debate about the role of tariffs in U.S. trade policy, and the balance between protecting domestic industries and fostering international trade relations.”,