The article raises the pressing question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) will ultimately serve to save or obliterate humanity, a query that often emerges in discussions surrounding the author's professional background in the field. This dichotomous narrative, characterized by both messianic and apocalyptic perspectives, reflects a widespread perception of AI technologies as incredibly powerful yet inherently unpredictable. The troubling aspect of this narrative is its propagation by the contemporary technological elite and their associates, who might be expected to challenge such a dogmatic storyline, which is challenging to substantiate or refute scientifically.

The author points out that aside from the objective probability of being either saved or destroyed by AI—likely landing somewhere in between—there is a subjective realization that the narrative is commercially viable. With global investments in AI surpassing one trillion dollars, the economic implications of promoting such narratives cannot be ignored. This trend suggests that the allure of dramatic stories about AI's potential outcomes serves as a catalyst for both investment and public interest, feeding into an ecosystem that thrives on uncertainty and speculation across the tech landscape.

In conclusion, the ongoing dialogue surrounding the risks and benefits of AI is not merely an academic or technical issue but is deeply intertwined with societal narratives and financial motivations. As debates continue within the tech community and beyond, it becomes crucial to navigate the complexities of AI's future responsibly, considering both the potential advantages and the ethical ramifications of advancing these technologies.