In a recent press conference, Donald Trump expressed his disdain for the Supreme Court's ruling, which deemed his previously enacted tariff rates unconstitutional. This decision was particularly disappointing for Trump as it was supported by six justices, including two he had appointed during his presidency. Trump criticized the Court and stated that it was 'absolutely shameful' for them to lack the courage to do what is right for the country, indicating a sense of betrayal from his own appointees.

The ruling revolves around the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which the majority of the justices determined does not grant Trump the authority to impose tariffs. Trump's remarks suggest that he is contemplating alternative methods to impose tariffs despite the ruling. The expert Eirik Løkke commented on the unprecedented nature of using such laws in this context, highlighting the legal complexities involved in Trump's tariff strategies.

This Supreme Court ruling represents a significant setback for the Trump administration and reflects the ongoing tensions between the executive branch and the judiciary. The reaction from Trump also underscores his continued insistence on asserting his authority amid legal challenges, stirring further debate on the limits of presidential power in economic matters. This incident not only impacts Trump's political standing but also raises important questions about the balance of power between different branches of government in the United States.