The relationship between Carl Schmitt's work and Donald Trump's presidency has become a common topic of discussion, with many interpretations suggesting that Trump's policies are a direct manifestation of Schmitt's theories. This article contends that there is a reciprocal nature in the criticisms faced by Trump and the objections often raised against Schmitt's ideas. However, it argues that critics may not recognize that their disapproval of Trump can also echo some of Schmitt's positions, indicating a complex interplay between thought and practice.

At a deeper analytical level, the article brings attention to Schmitt's most recognized work, "The Concept of the Political," which will celebrate its centenary next year. This text holds significant implications for political theory, and understanding its context is crucial for dissecting its influence on contemporary politics, particularly as it relates to the polarized political landscape dominated by figures like Trump.

Additionally, the article suggests that engaging with Schmitt's work requires navigating multiple levels of analysis, such as ideological interpretations and concrete political applications. These layers provide a more nuanced understanding of how both Schmitt's ideas and Trump's actions resonate within modern political discourse. The discursive connection between the two invites further exploration of the implications for political strategy and thought in today’s world.