L. Linkevičius revealed what game D. Trump is playing: "V. Putin will be rehabilitated"
After negotiations in Geneva, doubts are raised about the effectiveness of such talks, which fail to resolve the core territorial disputes.
Post-Geneva negotiations have sparked concerns regarding the viability of continued discussions between global leaders, especially in light of the persistent territorial disputes that remain unresolved. Former Lithuanian Minister of Foreign Affairs Linas Linkevičius commented on the circumstances, pointing out that discussions yield little new information, reiterating long-standing disagreements, particularly regarding territory between involved nations.
The crux of the matter, as articulated by Linkevičius, is whether a change in approach is necessary, akin to that taken by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. He champions the idea that personal dialogue with opposing leaders, like a face-to-face with Vladimir Putin, may circumvent the stagnation that characterizes current diplomatic efforts. Without direct engagement, he posits, significant advances are unlikely.
Linkevičius also reflects on the international implications of continuing to ignore the nuances of these negotiations. As the geopolitical landscape evolves, the re-evaluation of figures such as Putin might not only signal a shift in diplomatic strategy but also raise ethical questions on the international stage. The discussion urges leaders to reconsider their tactics to break down existing barriers in international relations.