The recent discussions in the Finnish Parliament regarding Eastern Finland left many questions about the progress of the proposed special economic zone guided by the Confederation of Finnish Industries (EK). With the region's vitality being affected by various issues, including the consequences of the Ukraine war and border closures, special representative Harri Broman has proposed the establishment of a special economic area comprising Kajaani and Imatra to boost local economic conditions.

However, Finance Minister Riikka Purra clarified during the discussions that the government does not have plans for significant measures concerning the proposed special economic area. Instead, she emphasized a comprehensive development strategy for all of Finland, highlighting the government's Eastern Finland program, which aims to support employment and entrepreneurship in the region. This statement has prompted reactions from oppositional parties in Eastern Finland, particularly from members of the Centre Party, who raised concerns regarding her comments and the adequacy of support for their region.

The growing frustration among local representatives points to a broader discontent with the federal government's engagement in regional matters, raising questions about political prioritization. As economic challenges mount due to external factors such as international conflict, the reaction to Minister Purra's comments could stir further debates about the government's ability to address regional disparities effectively and whether focused economic initiatives for Eastern Finland will be considered in future budget discussions.