In a recent commentary, Chris Selley highlights the growing concerns among Ottawa unions regarding the local government's outdated employment practices. Union leaders argue that instead of modernizing public service roles to align with the demands of the 21st century, the government is reverting to outdated models reminiscent of the 1950s. This regression is viewed as a key reason why potential employees are reluctant to seek jobs within the Ottawa public sector.

The article further emphasizes dissatisfaction with the National Capital Commission's (NCC) budget allocation for renovations of 24 Sussex Drive, the official residence of the Prime Minister. Selley criticizes the NCC’s proposed $37 million renovation plan and suggests that funds could be better utilized, either by selling the property or investing in more practical housing options. The juxtaposition of the NCC's renovation budget against current housing needs in Ottawa raises significant questions about government priorities and responsiveness to contemporary challenges.

Selley proposes a radical idea for the future of Ottawa: that instead of maintaining the current structures, the city could consider returning downtown to its natural state. This provocative suggestion reflects broader frustrations with urban governance and the mismanagement of public resources. In essence, the commentary calls for a re-evaluation of not only the physical spaces government occupies but also the very nature of public service work in Ottawa, advocating for a transition towards more progressive and appealing employment practices.