In recent discussions on an informal WhatsApp group among Sciences Po Paris professors, controversial statements have surfaced regarding the death of Quentin Deranque, a known nationalist and traditionalist Catholic. The professors have employed derogatory terms to label Deranque, arguing that his lynching by far-left activists was justified. This has sparked significant backlash and raised concerns about the moral implications of such discussions within the academic community.

The situation escalated after Deranque's violent death, which has polarized opinions, with many attributing labels such as 'neo-Nazi' to him based on his affiliations. The professors' remarks have not only drawn criticism from various public figures but have also ignited a debate about the accountability of educators in their personal expressions of ideology, especially when related to acts of violence.

This incident underscores a deeper issue within academia concerning the responsibility of intellectuals to engage thoughtfully and sensitively with topics of extremism and violence. It brings to the forefront the dangers of rhetoric that dehumanizes individuals and raises questions about the role of educational institutions in fostering discourse that does not incite further division or violence.