In Opava, Czechia, local residents are voicing complaints against the city's leadership for their decision not to provide a public square for a model of a Russian drone. The situation has sparked discussions on freedom of expression and public art, as residents believe that the model could represent artistic protest against the ongoing conflict involving Russia. Many are questioning the leadership's stance, suggesting that such installations could foster dialogue and reflection within the community.

Critics argue that denying a space for the drone exhibit reflects a broader issue of limiting civic engagement and expression within the city. They emphasize the importance of supporting artistic initiatives that provoke thought and conversation, particularly in relation to pressing global issues like war and peace. The model of the Russian drone, they believe, serves as a symbol that could garner public interest and debate regarding military conflicts.

Opava's leadership has yet to publicly respond to these criticisms. The incident highlights the delicate balance local governments must maintain between managing public spaces and allowing freedom of expression. As discussions continue to unfold, the outcome may influence future decisions regarding public artworks and community engagement in civic matters in Opava.