In the Bihar Assembly, a significant controversy emerged over the issue of Brahmanism, driven by demands from leftist legislators for the implementation of new UGC guidelines. This dispute intensified as opposing legislators labeled their dissenters as Brahmanical, exacerbating tensions within the assembly. The atmosphere became so charged that assembly speaker Vijay Sinha was compelled to intervene in the debate to restore order.

Vijay Sinha's intervention highlighted the deep divides within the assembly, as he remarked that the actions of certain members were detrimental to society. The exchange reflects not only the immediate conflict over educational guidelines but also broader ideological battles within Indian politics, particularly regarding caste and societal structures, which continue to be contentious issues in contemporary discourse.

This incident could have implications for future discussions in the Bihar Assembly and set a precedent for how similar conflicts may be handled, as well as reflecting ongoing societal tensions regarding caste systems and their influence on educational policies in India, particularly under the UGC framework.