In an interview on Yle's Ykkösaamu, Finnish Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen addressed her concerns about President Donald Trump's peace council, stating that its charter notably does not reference the foundational principles of the United Nations or international law. This oversight raises red flags for the Finnish government, especially since the council was intended to focus on peace-building efforts in accordance with international legal standards. Valtonen's statement indicates a cautious approach from Finland regarding potential involvement with the council, emphasizing that they are not planning to join at this time.

Valtonen also highlighted that the expansive scope of the peace council came as a surprise to Finland. Initially, the council was expected to center around the reconstruction of Gaza, but it appears poised to address a broader range of conflicts in the Middle East. This unexpected breadth might create additional complexities for Finland, as the government seeks to navigate its diplomatic stance amid evolving international relations and potential commitments.

Moreover, Valtonen pointed out unforeseen aspects such as membership fees and Trump's personal influence within the council, which have raised additional questions about its structure and governance. These developments signify a pivotal moment for Finland as it assesses the potential implications of engaging with an institution that diverges from established international norms. The reactions from Finnish officials indicate a careful consideration of Finland's foreign policy strategies in relation to global peace and conflict resolution.