The article opens with an ironic take on the prevailing narrative that Donald Trump was a dictator, arguing that this characterization came from those who significantly misjudged his impact on America. It references the warnings from American experts who predicted dire consequences for the U.S. and democracy with Trump in office, yet suggests that these fears were exaggerated. The author presents Trump as a figure misunderstood by foreign observers, particularly in Italy, who are out of touch with real American dynamics.

In analyzing Trump's presidency, the author emphasizes that the strength of American democracy lies not within the presidency but in the system of checks and balances that regulate power. Regardless of how strong a president may appear, the actual governance occurs within a collaborative and contended political landscape where the populace plays a critical role. This illustrates a broader point: the true measure of a democracy is not in the actions of one leader but in the ability of the populace and institutions to hold that leader accountable.

Ultimately, the piece suggests that the criticisms leveled against Trump were based on a misunderstanding of American society and governance. By framing Trump as a dictator, critics risk oversimplifying complex political dynamics and overlooking the resilience embedded in American democratic practices. The article serves as a defense of Trump while invoking a broader critique of how foreign perspectives can distort the understanding of American political narratives.