In a recent opinion piece, psychologist Alain Topor critiques the prevailing attitudes within Sweden's immigration policies, highlighting a troubling shift toward valuing immigrants solely based on their economic viability. The article is a response to the government's deportation policies, which Topor argues are inhumane and unjust, especially when those affected are contributing members of society. He points out that deportations often target industrious immigrants who work in essential sectors like healthcare and public transport, raising questions about the ethical implications of such decisions.

Topor expresses concern that society has adopted a cold, calculated approach to immigration, prioritizing financial return over fundamental human compassion. He challenges the narrative surrounding which immigrants should be allowed to remain, suggesting that the criteria have become too narrow and transactional. He emphasizes that immigrants who integrate, learn the language, and contribute positively to society should not be at risk of deportation, presenting them as vital members of the community rather than mere economic units.

This debate reflects broader tensions in Sweden regarding immigration and social policy. As public discourse increasingly grapples with the morality of governmental decisions, Topor's arguments urge a reevaluation of how humanity and economic considerations intersect in shaping immigration practices. The piece serves as a call to action for a more humanitarian and inclusive approach to immigration policy that recognizes the contributions of all individuals, regardless of their immediate economic output.