In a recent ruling, the Court of Justice of São Paulo denied a compensation claim from a public servant in Itanhaém who alleged he was assaulted by a fellow municipal worker. The claimant, who worked as a truck driver, sought R$ 103,000 (approximately USD 20,000) in moral damages for injuries sustained during the incident, which he attributed to a violent attack with a hoe. However, the court concluded that the altercation stemmed from a personal dispute rather than being connected to their professional duties, thus making the municipality not liable for the damages under the law.

The court's determination came after the public servant's claim was dismissed at both first and second instances. The presiding judge emphasized the importance of distinguishing personal conflicts from workplace grievances, noting that incidents of violence that arise outside the professional context do not warrant municipal accountability. This verdict illustrates the legal framework governing employer liability in Brazil, which typically protects municipalities from claims unless directly related to work-related activities.

The case highlights ongoing issues surrounding workplace safety and employee relations within the public sector in Brazil, particularly in municipalities where tensions may arise between staff. As public servants navigate personal grievances, this decision sets a precedent underscoring the limitations of legal recourse for workers seeking compensation for injuries sustained in non-work-related conflicts. It also raises questions about the broader implications for workplace conduct and the responsibilities of local governments in managing employee disputes.