The article explores a prevalent myth within Estonian politics, where it is believed that despite disagreements among parties on a variety of topics, there exists a harmonious consensus on national defense. This notion suggests that political factions can set aside their differences when it comes to security matters, presenting Estonia's approach to defense as a unifying factor amidst divisions in other areas.

However, the text challenges this assumption, indicating that the reality of political consensus may not be as straightforward as it appears. The article argues that while national defense is often cited as a common ground, underlying tensions and differences in party ideologies could influence decision-making and effectiveness in this critical area. It emphasizes the importance of examining these dynamics to understand the true nature of cooperation in Estonian politics.

Ultimately, this discussion raises questions about the reliability of the consensus myth in practical politics, particularly in light of current geopolitical tensions. The implications for Estonia's defense policy and organizational strategy may be significant, necessitating a reconsideration of how party alliances and conflicts could impact the nation’s security strategies moving forward.