The article features insights from military expert Elias Hanna, who evaluates potential confrontation scenarios between the United States and Iran regarding military action in the region. At the heart of the discussion is whether a limited U.S. strike would suffice or if it could spiral into a protracted war of attrition. Hanna emphasizes the heightened military presence of the United States in the region, noting that it is at its highest level since 2003, and suggests this military buildup serves purposes beyond mere deterrence, positioning the U.S. for potential coercion as well.

Hanna elaborates that the dynamics between the U.S. and Iran reveal a challenging path to diplomatic resolution concerning Iran's nuclear program. Both sides appear to be establishng maximum demands and setting red lines without having reached common ground for negotiations. The situation is further complicated by Israel's stance, which has been described as increasingly eager for confrontation, fearing the conjunction of Iranian missile capabilities with possible nuclear advancements in the future.

In discussing Israel's defensive capabilities, Hanna references a recent conflict during the 12-day war in June. He indicates that Israel's missile defense systems have limitations, evidenced by over 30 missiles landing within its territory, underscoring the precarious nature of the situation and the potential consequences of any escalation in hostilities between the U.S. and Iran.