In light of a recent Supreme Court ruling declaring the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration illegitimate, Donald Trump is reportedly exploring alternative legal avenues to re-impose tariffs. The ruling criticized the use of federal emergency powers, leading to a backlash from Trump, who described the decision as 'shameful'. This reaction indicates his continued commitment to utilizing tariffs as a tool for economic policy despite judicial obstacles.

According to sources cited by the New York Times, Trump and his team have been preparing for the possibility of the Supreme Court ruling against their tariff policies. Among the options being considered are invoking Section 301 and Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Section 301 allows the U.S. to impose tariffs following an investigation into unfair trade practices by other countries, a strategy that Trump previously employed during his presidency, particularly against China.

This potential shift signifies a complex dance between legal frameworks and economic policy. If Trump successfully invokes these sections, it could lead to new tariffs and renewed trade tensions, altering the landscape of international trade relations. The implications of such a move could resonate through various sectors, affecting both American consumers and businesses engaged in international trade.