Lawyers for the owner of the Violet biscuit factory are preparing to submit a request to lift his pre-trial detention, claiming that the measure is disproportionate. As investigations proceed, reports indicate that a strong and unusual odor present in the production area was known to several employees, but the management attributed it to secondary causes instead of a potential dangerous source. The unfolding details reveal a complex web of omissions, technical incompatibilities, and security gaps that seem to have preceded the fatal explosion.

Documents from a company responsible for energy installations show that serious deviations from specifications had been noted as early as July 2025. These included inadequate distances between tanks, questionable network durability, and unsuitable construction materials. The cost to address these issues had been estimated at 32,000 euros, but according to the data, management sought a cheaper option, leading to a new quote of 22,300 euros. This potentially reflects a pattern of negligence in prioritizing cost over safety in a factory environment that ultimately resulted in tragedy.

The implications of these findings are significant, not only for the owner and management of the factory but also for regulatory bodies overseeing workplace safety. The legal proceedings may highlight systemic failures in enforcing safety regulations and the need for stricter oversight in industries involving hazardous materials. As the story unfolds, it raises questions about corporate responsibility and the prioritization of profits over employee safety, which could have wider repercussions for the industry as a whole.