In The Gambia, Fatou Sanyang recounts the enduring physical and emotional scars inflicted by female genital mutilation (FGM), an act that has been condemned globally as a human rights violation. Despite a 2015 legal ban on FGM, local religious traditionalists are contesting the law in the Supreme Court, arguing for the practice as a facet of cultural and religious identity. Sanyang, who experienced FGM at a young age, emphasizes the pain and trauma associated with the procedure, which many women in her community continue to endure.

The relevance of this case is heightened by previous tragedies linked to FGM, including the deaths of two babies attributed to complications arising from the practice, which sparked national and international outrage. As the court prepares to resume hearings on the matter, it brings to light the struggle between long-established cultural practices and the push for modern human rights standards, particularly concerning women's health and autonomy. The societal divide is palpable as Islamic leaders advocate for the preservation of FGM on religious grounds, while health advocates underscore the severe negative impacts on women's physical and psychological wellbeing.

The outcome of this legal battle will not only influence legislation in Gambia but may also impact the broader discourse around FGM in Africa and beyond. With heightened international scrutiny, Gambian society stands at a crossroads, faced with the challenge of reconciling tradition with the rights and health of women, as advocates for both sides await the court's decision in a case that could dictate the future of FGM in the nation.