In Poland, recent developments on judicial reforms have stirred significant political controversy. On February 19, the Presidential Chancellery published a draft bill associated with the current issues within the country's judiciary, championed by Karol Nawrocki. This proposal aims to decisively tackle unlawful attempts to undermine judicial nominations made at the request of the National Judicial Council, addressing practices deemed inconsistent with the constitution and constitutional court rulings. The bill has sparked debates regarding its implications for judicial independence and practices.

Włodzimierz Czarzasty, a prominent political figure and the Marshal of the Sejm, has publicly opposed Nawrocki's initiative. During a press conference, he expressed concerns about the proposed legislation, particularly highlighting that it includes stringent penalties of up to ten years imprisonment for judges who refuse to participate in judicial panels. This punitive measure has intensified the existing friction between Czarzasty and Nawrocki, showcasing a deeper party-based conflict surrounding judicial independence and reform in Poland.

Czarzasty’s intervention indicates a critical stance toward executing such reforms without broader consensus. As the Venice Commission, an advisory body for legal and constitutional matters, prepares to review the situation in Poland, it suggests international scrutiny and potential repercussions concerning the rule of law in the country. The ongoing debates illustrate how judicial reforms remain a highly contentious issue, critical for the balance of power within Poland's democratic structures.