Elvish Yadav, a prominent YouTuber, received stern rebukes from the Supreme Court of India over his handling of snakes in a music video, leading to significant concerns about the message his actions send to the public. The court articulated that permitting celebrities to misuse vulnerable animals could lead to harmful societal implications. Justices MM Sundresh and N Kotishwar Singh underscored that snakes are protected species and cannot be harmed or exploited, highlighting the importance of wildlife protection legislation in such contexts.

During the hearing, Yadav's attorney, Mukta Gupta, asserted that the snakes did not belong to Yadav and claimed that her client only made a guest appearance in a music video where someone else managed the snakes. The court, however, insisted on examining Yadav's direct involvement and emphasized accountability regardless of the circumstances. This incident has prompted a broader discussion about the responsibilities of public figures in their interactions with wildlife and the repercussions of displaying such behaviors.

The Supreme Court's decisive stance reflects a growing concern in India regarding wildlife conservation and the ethical treatment of animals by influencers and entertainers. As the legal proceedings advance under the Wildlife Protection Act, this case serves as a reminder of the need for stricter regulations and accountability measures for individuals, particularly public figures, who engage in activities that may endanger wildlife.