In this editorial piece, the author reflects on the irony of purchasing an expensive smartphone, often priced between 800 to 1500 euros, only to cover it with a seven-euro rubber case. This act raises questions about the appreciation of design and engineering, where each component of the phone is crafted meticulously, yet is concealed under a protective layer that detracts from its aesthetic value. The author introduces the concept of 'a tragedy of aesthetics' as the ownership of such advanced technology leads consumers to prioritize protection over visual appreciation.

The piece delves into the physical realities that smartphones face in everyday use. Highlighting the trade-offs manufacturers make between durability and design, the author notes that while the latest advancements may enhance scratch resistance, they simultaneously increase vulnerability to impacts. When a smartphone inevitably falls, the impact is often concentrated in the corners, leading to potential breakage. This presents a dilemma for consumers who want to balance the beauty and practicality of their devices amidst the risks involved in daily handling.

Lastly, the author shares a personal experiment of going without a protective case, emphasizing their skills in keeping devices secure. However, this attempt is contrasted against the reality that many individuals do not have the same level of caution, leading to compromised devices. The editorial ultimately raises awareness about the ongoing struggle between enjoying the design of a high-end smartphone and the practical needs of protection, creating a dialogue on consumer behavior regarding technology use.