The aftermath of Norway's recent curling match has ignited controversy, particularly after Canadian players faced allegations of deliberately losing to Norway. This speculation was initially brought forth by Eva Lund, a curling expert at SVT, who suggested that Canada's loss was strategic to evade a confrontation with Switzerland in the semifinals. This assertion has gained traction, particularly among members of the Swiss curling team who were eliminated from the tournament.

Switzerland had an impressive run in the group stages, winning all their matches, but faced a shocking defeat in the semifinals against Great Britain. Following their exit, Swiss player Pablo Lachat-Couchepin openly criticized Canada’s performance against Norway, hinting that it was not a coincidence that Canada chose to field a reserve player for their crucial match. Lachat-Couchepin implied that those following the sport could easily deduce the motive behind Canada's decision, suggesting a shared belief among competitors about possible match-fixing. The implications of such accusations could tarnish the reputation of curling and raise concerns about the integrity of competitive sports. The controversy highlights the pressure teams face in high-stakes matches and the strategies they sometimes employ to navigate tournament structures. As discussions around sportsmanship intensify, the incident may prompt the sport's governing bodies to examine rules regarding match-playing tactics to preserve competitive fairness.