Trump has extended the deadline for Iran to negotiate a deal from 10 to 15 days, leading to mixed reactions from experts on the implications of this change.
In a recent statement, President Donald Trump extended his ultimatum for Iran from 10 days to 15 days, giving the country more time to agree on a substantial negotiation regarding its nuclear program. This announcement came shortly after Trump emphasized the urgency for Iran to reach a beneficial deal, warning of severe consequences if they fail to comply. The remarks were made during a meeting concerning Gaza, reflecting the interconnectedness of various geopolitical issues in the region.
Experts have voiced differing opinions on the implications of Trump's extended deadline. Former Ambassador Frederick Hof advised Iranian leaders to promptly negotiate a satisfactory deal to avoid adverse outcomes, while Stephen Hadley from the Brookings Institution cautioned against overvaluing Trump's statements regarding timelines for military action against Iran. This division among analysts highlights the uncertainty within the U.S. foreign policy community regarding the best approach to Iran and their nuclear ambitions.
Trump's preferred outcome remains a diplomatic agreement that would completely dismantle Iran's nuclear capabilities and halt its support for proxy forces in the region. The extended deadline could be seen as a strategic move to allow diplomacy a better chance while still keeping the pressure on Iran, indicating a delicate balance between resolution through negotiation and the looming threat of military action.
