The article questions the assertion that Cyprus is solely responsible for the delays in the electrical interconnection cable with Greece and Israel, suggesting that this blame may be excessive. It raises concerns about whether Greece can deploy the cable near Kasos while facing Turkish harassment, especially given recent tensions marked by military presence rather than diplomatic gestures. The situation is further complicated by the historical context of previous attempts to lay the cable, where an Italian vessel withdrew due to Turkish threats.

Additionally, the article highlights the lack of confidence among stakeholders regarding the project’s viability, especially following assurances from Greece's Foreign Minister George Gerapetritis about proceeding with the cable installation. Many doubt these reassurances due to the emerging obstacles and technical preconditions that appear to arise unexpectedly, causing frustration among those invested in the project's success. The political dynamics and military posturing in the region contribute to the uncertainty surrounding the project, which is of significant geopolitical importance.

In conclusion, the piece illustrates the intricate web of political, military, and technical challenges that hamper the ambitious East Med interconnection project. The tense relations between Cyprus, Greece, Israel, and Turkey, coupled with local public skepticism and the precarious balance of power in the Eastern Mediterranean, threaten not only the project's future but also broader regional energy initiatives. Stakeholders remain anxious about the implications of Turkish military presence and the effective measures needed to protect their interests in this contentious situation.