In a recent broadcast titled 'News Dive,' Jang Dong-hyuk voiced his strong opposition to the concept of 'presidential favoritism,' particularly as it relates to the South Korean judiciary and their decisions involving President Yoon Suk-yeol. The program, hosted by Go Hyun-jun and featuring lawyers Noh Young-hee and Jang Yoon-mi, delved into the highly controversial ruling by G-kyu Yeon, which has incited widespread public anger. The ruling has been perceived as unfairly shielding President Yoon from scrutiny, thereby raising questions about the integrity of the legal system and its role in upholding justice in politically charged cases.

Additionally, the discussion highlighted the low credibility of the notes presented by No Sang-won in relation to the contentious case, adding fuel to the existing dissatisfaction among citizens regarding the judicial process. Jang Dong-hyuk emphasized the presumption of innocence, reiterating that it is a fundamental principle that should not be overlooked, especially in politically sensitive trials. The tension and discourse surrounding these judicial matters reflect deeper societal concerns about political accountability and the balance of power in South Korea's democratic system.

Moreover, the program addressed broader issues, including the recent assassination attempt on President Yoon, which has not been classified as a terrorist incident, suggesting potential failures within the security apparatus. This incident, coupled with ongoing criticisms regarding the work conditions of the Blue House staff, underscores the complex landscape of South Korean politics, where public trust is fragile and the stakes are high for all involved parties.