In a tense decision-making process reminiscent of its more politically charged past, the Italian Superior Council of the Judiciary (CSM) appointed Alessandra Dolci as the new public prosecutor of Venice, resulting from a tie vote with fourteen votes on each side. Dolci, who currently serves as an assistant prosecutor in Milan, was chosen primarily due to her seniority among the candidates. The circumstances surrounding her appointment are particularly noteworthy as they reflect underlying tensions within the judiciary, compounded by the controversial background connected to her husband, Pier Camillo Davigo, a notable figure in Italian legal history.

Davigo, a former public prosecutor known for his role in the Mani Pulite anti-corruption investigations, recently faced legal challenges himself, having been sentenced to over a year in prison for the disclosure of official secrets. This familial connection has sparked debates about the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, raising questions about conflicting interests and ethical standards within the upper echelons of Italian law. The appointment of Dolci thus not only fills a vital role in Venice's legal landscape but serves as a focal point for wider societal concerns regarding judicial independence and influence.

Competing against Dolci for the position was Sebastiano Ardita, an assistant prosecutor in Catania, who had also participated in the judicial proceedings against Davigo, thereby complicating the dynamics of the candidacy. The outcome of this election underscores the profound divisions within the CSM, reflecting ongoing struggles over power and representation in Italy's judiciary and hinting at future implications for legal reform and governance in the country.