The article discusses the troubling transformation of María Guardiola, the candidate from the People's Party (PP) for the presidency of Extremadura, as she seemingly adapts her views on feminism to align with the far-right through her newfound affiliation with Vox. The author expresses disdain at seeing Guardiola's public stance, which previously condemned machismo, now diluted to appease a party that embodies those very sentiments. This shift serves as a profound symbol of the pressures women face in political settings, suggesting that her degradation represents a broader warning to other women aspiring for power against patriarchal authority.

The piece further elaborates that society has become accustomed to politicians abandoning their ideologies and principles in the pursuit of maintaining power, yet Guardiola's case is notably jarring. Her acceptance of Vox's demands reflects not only her personal political compromises but also an unsettling trend in which women are subjected to humiliation in public settings as a deterrent for others who may challenge established patriarchal dominance. The article implies that this scenario sends a message of intimidation to women in politics, illustrating how deep-rooted machismo impacts female candidates.

In conclusion, the article emphasizes the need for a reevaluation of how political power dynamics affect women's representation in Spain. Guardiola's public image transformation is more than an individual case; it signifies a troubling pattern in which women are called to conform to male-dominated political narratives, facing severe repercussions if they dare to oppose them. This situation necessitates a critical examination of political integrity, gender equality, and the collective responsibility to support women in leadership roles against oppressive forces.