In Garlasco, the spotlight is on a judicial error and its ongoing implications as the nation waits for key developments in a criminal case that has captured widespread attention. This situation is being utilized strategically by Italy's ruling right-wing coalition as they enter the crucial final weeks of the referendum campaign. The government hopes to exploit public interest in these cases to galvanize support for the proposed referendum, which could alter the political landscape significantly if the 'yes' votes prevail.

During this campaign period, the government has identified various appealing narratives – namely the controversies surrounding Sea-Watch, a notable NGO involved in rescue operations in the Mediterranean, and issues pertinent to Albania’s political relationship with Italy. The strategy seems to rely on creating a narrative that frames the referendum as a decisive moment for the country, one that could potentially redefine its political alignment and relationship with Europe.

As the referendum approaches, the focus on these emblematic cases aims not only to elicit emotional responses from voters but also to redirect attention away from the government's own challenges and controversies. This tactic could be critical in the battle for public opinion as both political camps mobilize their support bases to ensure turnout and sway undecided voters, showcasing how judicial and humanitarian issues are intertwined with the current political climate in Italy.