In his article, Fookuse editor Martin Ehala raises concerns about the suitability of artificial intelligence (AI) for evaluating written essays. He argues that, given the systematic biases that AI systems exhibit, relying on them as assessors can lead to unfair evaluations. This perspective is particularly important in educational contexts, where assessment can significantly influence a student's academic journey.

Ehala emphasizes that AI technologies, while powerful, are not devoid of flaws and biases embedded within their algorithms. He calls for caution in integrating AI into educational assessment processes, urging educators and institutions to carefully consider the implications of using such technologies. The nuances and complexities of human writing may be lost on AI, rendering it inadequate for comprehensive evaluation.

Ultimately, the article serves as a cautionary reminder of the limitations of AI in subjective tasks such as essay evaluation. Ehala advocates for a balanced approach that incorporates human oversight to ensure fairness and accuracy in academic assessments, highlighting the crucial role human evaluators play in understanding and appreciating the subtleties of student writing.