In Estonia, the Internal Security Service (KAPO) gathered extensive evidence against a former top official of the transport agency, suspecting him of misconduct involving a nearly 200,000-euro state contract awarded to companies associated with his alleged mistress. After a protracted investigation lasting approximately 3.5 years, the prosecution decided against proceeding with the case, deeming that further legal action was unreasonable. Prosecutor Mairen Mangusson cited the possibility of reforming the suspect's behavior without punishment as a reason for the decision.

On April 25 of the previous year, the state prosecutor concluded the criminal proceedings through a deal known as "opportunity," whereby the former suspect required to pay 3,000 euros to state revenues. This arrangement effectively cleared the individual of a criminal record, allowing him to maintain a clean slate without the stigma of formal charges. This outcome has raised questions regarding the ethics of such settlements and their implications for accountability in public service.

The situation highlights the broader issues of corruption and governance in Estonia, particularly in the allocation of state contracts. While the legislative and law enforcement bodies seek to uphold integrity, incidents like this could undermine public trust in the system, suggesting that financial penalties rather than criminal prosecution may not adequately deter misconduct among public officials. Discussions about reform and enhancing transparency in public sector contracting are increasingly urgent as society grapples with these ethical dilemmas.