Poland's National Council of the Judiciary (KRS) reform law, passed by the Sejm on January 23 and accepted by the Senate shortly after, was vetoed by President Karol Nawrocki on February 19. This reform was seen as a major change in the judicial landscape of Poland, primarily aimed at revamping how members of the KRS are selected, stripping the Sejm (the lower house of parliament) of its traditional role in choosing judges for this body. The intention behind the reform was to restore greater independence to the KRS and reduce political influence over the judiciary.

The proposed changes included the establishment of a more democratically represented KRS, consisting of a specific number of judges from various court levels: six judges from district courts, three from regional courts, and two from appellate courts. This restructuring aimed to ensure that those who are most directly involved in the judiciary are the ones selecting their representatives on the council, presumably leading to a more impartial and judiciary-focused governance. Nonetheless, the reform was met with opposition comprising concerns about the potential risks of reduced checks and balances in the justice system.

The veto by the President highlights the ongoing tensions in Poland regarding judicial independence and political influences, especially amid ongoing disputes with the European Union over judicial reforms. As discussions continue around the future of the judiciary in Poland, this veto could lead to further parliamentary debates and adjustments, underscoring the complexities of balancing political authority and judicial independence in a democratic framework.