Manuel Adorni, Argentina's Chief of Cabinet, publicly criticized union leaders for their role in the national strike, labeling their actions as extortionate and detrimental to democracy. He noted that the negative perception of union leaders is reflected in their high disapproval ratings among the public, suggesting that their tactics are harming rather than helping workers. Adorni emphasized that the unions’ actions create significant barriers for workers trying to reach their jobs, particularly when they disrupt transportation systems.

During an interview, Adorni compared the current situation with that of the previous administration under Alberto Fernández, arguing that despite experiencing dire economic conditions like soaring inflation and high poverty rates, there were no strikes back then. He contended that the motivations behind the current actions of unions are either strange or incomprehensible, indicating a disconnect between union leadership and the actual concerns of the workforce they claim to represent. Adorni's remarks highlight tensions between the government and unions as they struggle over the direction of labor relations in Argentina.

The controversy surrounding the national strike raises questions about the effectiveness and relevance of union actions in contemporary Argentina. Adorni's condemnation may resonate with some segments of the population who are frustrated with union disruptions, but it also risks escalating conflicts with union leaders, who argue that strikes are a necessary tool to advocate for workers' rights. This ongoing debate over the role of unions in the labor market and the government's position on workers' rights continues to shape Argentina's socio-political landscape.