Over the last decade, Chinese think tanks have enjoyed a unique position where they are both supported by the government and allowed some degree of autonomy. This dynamic has facilitated the growth of think tanks that not only provide policy recommendations but also promote China’s soft power on the global stage. The participation of retired officials in these organizations has been seen as advantageous, bringing their experience and connections to the table.

However, recent high-profile corruption scandals involving retired officials from some of these think tanks have cast doubts on the future of this model. The incidents represent a significant shift as the government intensifies its national anti-corruption campaign, suggesting that the ties between think tanks and seasoned ex-officials could become problematic. Observers note that while these connections have historically provided strategic advantages, they might now expose these institutions to greater scrutiny and potential liabilities.

The implications of these events are profound, signaling a potential shift in how think tanks operate within the political landscape of China. As the government continues to crack down on corruption, the once-flourishing model of star ex-officials participating in think tanks may need to undergo significant reforms to retain their credibility and effectiveness. This situation holds the potential to reshape the relationship between the state and its think tanks, as well as redefine the parameters of influence in China’s soft power strategy moving forward.