The article argues that the narrative surrounding Norwegian aid has become overly simplistic and no longer fully represents the reality of its impact. While the far-right criticizes aid as benefiting a global elite, politicians defend it as a means of solidarity with the world's poorest. This simplification, particularly of the far-right's argument, is gaining traction because the traditional justification fails to encompass the complexities of modern aid.

Norwegian aid, historically seen as a pillar of the country's commitment to global solidarity, now faces increased scrutiny. The political discourse is shifting from how much Norway gives to the rationale behind these contributions. The author highlights that a significant portion of the aid is now used to fund international public goods, such as climate initiatives and pandemic preparedness, which do not always align with the narrative of direct assistance to the impoverished nations.

As the debate intensifies, there is a clear need for an updated and honest rationale for Norwegian aid to maintain its legitimacy and effectiveness. The article implies that without this modernization in perspective, aid efforts risk being overshadowed by simplistic critiques and could affect Norway's international role as a responsible donor.