The article delves into the recent trend in European political circles of advocating for 'strategic autonomy' for Europe. This concept centers around the idea that Europe should reduce its dependencies on external powers such as Russia for gas and oil, China for rare earth materials, and the United States for nuclear protection. The rhetoric around this autonomy has gained significant attention in light of global political shifts and tensions.

However, the author argues that while the goal of strategic autonomy resonates on a theoretical level, the execution has been less than effective. The recent developments regarding new sanctions against Russia reveal the farcical nature of Europe’s stance. Despite the proclamations of independence and self-sufficiency, the intertwining economic and political realities challenge these aspirations, pointing to a persistent reliance that contradicts the declared objectives.

Ultimately, the commentary raises critical questions about the feasibility of Europe achieving true strategic autonomy in the context of its complex geopolitical landscape. It underscores a tension between ambitions and the existing dependencies that serve as obstacles, thus prompting a reflection on whether the current situation is farcical or tragic for Europe's future.