The article highlights a significant dispute within the Polish National Prosecutor's Office following a shooting incident involving a migrant during a military operation near the Belarus border. The director of the military department of the prosecutor's office, Colonel Tomasz Mackiewicz, asserted that there are no legal grounds for a directive issued by his superior, Deputy Prosecutor General Tomasz Janeczek, which called for the withdrawal of a conditional dismissal request against a soldier involved in the case. This internal conflict raises questions about the legal processes in sensitive cases involving military personnel and human rights issues, especially concerning migrants in Poland.

The issue stems from an intervention that led to the shooting of a migrant, sparking widespread attention and scrutiny of the actions of the military and law enforcement during operations along the border. Experts have conducted discussions regarding the incident, focusing on the circumstances under which the shooting occurred, as well as the responses from various levels of the prosecutor’s office. The public and legal community are particularly interested in the implications of this case for future military engagements and the treatment of migrants, which remain contentious topics in Poland.

Moreover, the General Prosecutor's actions taken three years post-incident highlight the slow-moving nature of legal accountability in sensitive cases. As arguments for revoking the conditional dismissal against the soldier are presented, the article sheds light on the broader implications for legal standards in military confrontations with civilians and the protection of human rights, further igniting debates on the Polish government’s approach to migration and border security.