Let's take a look at the script… What happened in Bad Bunny's Super Bowl halftime performance?
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl halftime performance has drawn scrutiny over alleged profanity, leading to a review by the FCC at the request of Republican Congressman Randy Feenstra.
Bad Bunny's halftime performance at the Super Bowl has stirred controversy, particularly due to allegations of profanity in Spanish during his set. Following the performance, U.S. Congressman Randy Feenstra called for an investigation and penalty from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), urging them to review the performance script as aired by NBC. The FCC's inquiry reflects broader cultural tensions regarding language and expression in American media, especially in the context of Bad Bunny's status as a Latinx artist who has significantly influenced American pop culture.
Despite the controversy, Anna Gomez, an FCC commissioner, reported that upon reviewing the performance transcript, there was no evidence of regulatory violations. She emphasized that no substantial grounds were found to subject the broadcasting network to punitive measures, suggesting that the concerns raised might be more politically motivated than based on a legitimate broadcasting infraction. The New York Post corroborated this by stating there were no explicit sexual lyrics in the performance and that the FCC would not pursue the matter further without new evidence.
Former President Donald Trump also criticized the performance on social media, describing it as one of the worst halftime shows in history, citing a lack of understanding of Bad Bunny's performance among the viewing public, particularly children. Trump's remarks highlight a continuing divide in public perception concerning cultural inclusivity and artistic expression within America’s mainstream entertainment venues, further complicating discussions around the influence of Latinx artists in U.S. popular culture.