The article analyzes the reasons behind Giorgia Meloni's avoidance of appearing on La7 shows, suggesting that she may fear engaging in debates that challenge her views. It highlights a recent show where the hosts, Giovanni Floris and Corrado Formigli, engaged in a discussion that lacked opposing viewpoints, creating a setting that some may perceive as lacking in genuine pluralism. The writer expresses skepticism about the authenticity of the dialogue presented, indicating that the atmosphere was more about mutual approval than critical discussion.

Additionally, the article points out the irony of the situation, where two journalists who should ideally represent diverse perspectives appear to be in agreement, leading to a scenario where the audience is left without contrasting opinions. This situation raises concerns about the state of media pluralism in Italy, particularly on platforms like La7 that are expected to facilitate rigorous debate. The piece suggests that without genuine disagreement, the quality of political discourse suffers, leaving citizens inadequately informed about differing viewpoints.

Ultimately, the piece serves as a critique of both Meloni's media strategy and the practice of journalism in Italy, questioning whether the current media landscape allows for real accountability and informed public debate. The article underscores the responsibility of media professionals to foster a genuine exchange of ideas rather than simply providing entertainment.