On Thursday, President Donald Trump launched the 'Board of Peace' in Washington, an institution intended to address ongoing conflicts, particularly in Gaza. This initiative attracted around two dozen world leaders and senior officials, notably aligning with several authoritarian-leaning figures while largely excluding traditional European democratic leaders. The formation of this Board follows a ceasefire negotiated in collaboration with Qatar and Egypt, aimed at mitigating the devastation experienced in Gaza over the last two years.

The United States has indicated that the new phase of peace efforts will focus on disarming Hamas, the entity responsible for a recent and unprecedented attack on Israel that triggered significant hostilities. Meanwhile, reports from Gaza suggest a troubling mortality rate, with at least 601 individuals reported killed by Israeli military actions since the commencement of the recent truce. The response from the Trump administration and its allies reflects a contentious geopolitical landscape, especially as it seeks to redefine US influence in the region amid changing international alliances.

As the meeting of the 'Board of Peace' unfolds, the implications of its outcomes are being closely monitored by global observers. The varying perspectives on the US approach to peace amidst ongoing tensions highlight the complexities of diplomatic engagements in a region marked by persistent conflict. This institution may play a pivotal role in shaping future policies and strategies regarding not only Gaza but broader Middle Eastern dynamics, particularly in how the US navigates its relationships with both traditional allies and more authoritarian regimes.