This article delves into the historical narratives constructed by Tsars and Soviet leaders that the modern Russian state utilizes to defend its annexation of Crimea. It highlights that propaganda often intertwines truth, half-truths, and outright lies to craft persuasive narratives and that Crimea is emblematic of this phenomenon. Its historical significance began in 1954 when it was transferred from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic under Nikita Khrushchev, a decision steeped in political symbolism related to the unity of Ukraine and Russia.

The narrative that presents Crimea as inherently Russian stems from events and interpretations rooted in both ancient and modern history. The article mentions the Pereyaslav Council of 1654, which is often cited to underline the supposed unity of Ukraine with Russia, further reinforcing the idea that Crimea should belong to Moscow. This interpretation serves as a tool for legitimizing contemporary geopolitical goals, whereby Russian historical ties to the region are presented as a mandate for control and annexation.

Additionally, the creation and perpetuation of these myths reflect a broader strategy by Russian authorities to engage in historical revisionism, thereby shaping both domestic and international perceptions of its geopolitical actions. By embedding these narratives into the public consciousness, the government aims to create a more favorable context for its policies, specifically regarding territorial disputes like that of Crimea. Such mythical frameworks not only influence contemporary political discourse but also have significant implications for Ukraine and regional stability.