Pros and cons of prohibiting social media use for minors under 16 for families, according to two experts
Experts discuss the implications of the Spanish government's proposal to prohibit social media access for minors under 16, emphasizing the need for parental guidance alongside regulatory measures.
The proposed regulation by the Spanish government to prohibit minors under 16 from accessing social media aligns with the principle of the best interest of the child, aiming to prevent foreseeable harm. This measure seeks to delay children's entry into platforms that are designed to capture attention, monetize personal data, and encourage prolonged engagement. The proposal is part of a larger legislative package focused on the protection of children and adolescents in digital environments, reflecting growing concerns about the impact of social media on younger users.
Experts, including a lawyer and an educator, caution that while this regulation is a step forward, it should not replace parental involvement or the role of schools in guiding children’s use of technology. They suggest that the responsibility of keeping children safe online does not solely lie with the government but should involve active participation from families and educational institutions. This highlights the complexity of navigating children's interaction with technology in a responsible manner.
The proposed ban follows similar regulations enacted in other countries, such as Australia, and discussions are underway in France to implement similar measures. This trend indicates a growing global recognition of the need for stricter regulations surrounding children's access to social media and digital platforms, raising important questions about privacy, autonomy, and the role of government in protecting young users.