The piece from El País highlights the Spanish government's intention to regulate social media platforms as an apparently simpler way to address ongoing political challenges, including stalled budgets and essential laws. Critics view this move as a distraction from the government's failure to tackle more complex socio-economic issues such as transportation infrastructure and housing crisis. The author suggests that these regulatory announcements are mere gestures intended to create the illusion of action without addressing the root problems.

Amidst a landscape dominated by powerful figures whose governance often evokes public hostility, the article draws a parallel between the challenges of confronting these entities and the political climate surrounding figures like Trump. The author argues that confronting these powers through regulations targeting social media could be seen as a safe way to critique systemic flaws without inviting direct repercussions. The commentary implies that such regulations may serve more as a political tool rather than a genuine effort to solve societal grievances, emphasizing the irony that criticism in this context can often be interpreted as a compliment.

Ultimately, the piece underscores a broader skepticism regarding the government's approach to social challenges, suggesting that while regulating social media may appear straightforward, it may only serve to divert attention from more pressing issues. The concerns raised invite readers to reconsider the efficacy of governmental interventions in the digital space and reflect on the implications of prioritizing such regulations over substantive policy advancements.