The upcoming meeting of the committee in Norway will focus on defining the mandate of the investigation committee concerning the Epstein documents. A key point of contention is whether the committee should limit itself to examining matters arising from these documents or expand its inquiry to examine broader issues within the foreign service. Progress Party committee leader Per-Willy Amundsen argues that the investigation should delve into a larger network of favoritism and connections within the foreign service, suggesting a comprehensive approach that traces back to the systems established in the 1990s.

In contrast, Ove Trellevik, the Conservative Party's representative on the oversight committee, expresses caution regarding the investigation's scope. He contends that it is essential for the investigation to remain focused on the revelations that have surfaced from the Epstein files, arguing that the committee must not attempt to cover every potential issue. Trellevik emphasizes that while the committee should stick to its primary focus, it should retain the flexibility to explore relevant leads outside the scope of the initial mandate.

This disagreement highlights the differing perspectives within Norwegian political parties regarding the investigation into the Epstein documents and their implications for the foreign service. The outcome of this deliberation will likely influence not only the future directions of the investigation but also reflect the broader political dynamics at play in Norway's approach to sensitive issues involving international connections and accountability.