MIHKEL KUNNUS ⟩ One should not give too powerful tools to self-harmers
Mihkel Kunnus argues that self-harm should not be viewed too liberally, as it often has broader implications beyond the individual.
In his article, editor Mihkel Kunnus addresses the complex nature of self-harm, suggesting that society must carefully consider how it approaches the topic. He asserts that self-harm is rarely an isolated action and can have wider consequences that affect not only the individual but also their community and social fabric. Rather than adopting a permissive attitude toward self-harming behavior, Kunnus advocates for a more responsible approach that recognizes the deeper psychological issues at play.
Kunnus highlights the potential dangers of providing individuals with extreme tools or methods for self-harming, stressing that the consequences can extend beyond personal harm. By enabling such actions, society risks normalizing self-destructive behaviors, which can lead to a cycle of harm that affects families, friends, and the broader community. He calls for a shift in perspective that emphasizes support, understanding, and intervention rather than endorsing harmful choices as a form of self-expression.
The implications of Kunnus’s argument are significant, as they challenge the current discourse surrounding mental health and self-harm. He encourages policymakers, mental health professionals, and society at large to reflect on their responsibilities in preventing self-harm and in supporting those who might be struggling. This approach could lead to more effective strategies for treatment and prevention, ultimately fostering healthier communities where individuals are supported rather than left to navigate their pain alone.